🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions regarding that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was appropriate. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all love a narrative, me too. But really. Even if the American defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is well justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else in their right mind had the lack of American champions on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six encounters over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on both forehand and backhand are more than adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the select few generational talents, however, he is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising quickness and fluidity of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

The American has made a several significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of American men winning major titles when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's play in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But Djokovic rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of agony. When he eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, who lost to the Spaniard in the following match and never especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not just say his emotions or the tactic he believed determined a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American told an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he does not achieve that objective, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for everybody else. {