🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age limit is a good first step," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after encountering harmful online content argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the state level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.