🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared solely negotiations was effective, and revealed new appeals had come from mediators to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a situation of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger defensively and psychologically from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states exercised their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the notion of worldwide standards, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict revealed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He stated the strikes commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently attempted to enforce their will during the talks. Dialogue can still be viable and continues the final answer to address disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will receive a answer in the identical approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."